Hegels Interpretation on Universal Love Research Paper

Hegels Interpretation on Universal Love - Research root ExampleThe fragment starts with the authors reasoning on equality. These contemplations of the equality of man in forward of the overlord must have been aroused in Hegel by the events and ideas of the French revolution. In this fragment, Hegel states that the equality of beneficial brings on the dependence of people. As a result, the man loses his domination over objects, and thus he loses his worth, whereas cosmos are used to measuring their worth by the degree of their influence over the objective world. thought of touch himself only a tiny part of the universe, the man starts despising himself, thus injuring his self and coming to perpetually greater discord. Whereas the object, severed from the subject, is dead, the only kind of love he can experience towards Lord and the universe is the love to the dead objects. The living union between the man and the world is not possible, period love towards the dead object is u nrequited. The individual finds himself opposed to the external world, entirely independent of it. The man loses the sense of life and does not see the essence of his existence. These passages, in fact, describe the state of many modern people. We pass by our lives attempting to overcome our l mavenliness and seeking help outside, we are not able to bear responsibility for our acts. timber detached from the external world we doom ourselves for a constant struggle with the opposed world, which often seems to be hostile to us. Not realizing that we are the part of the universe, just as our arms and legs are parts of our body, we are not able to hear the voice of God in us and understand his intentions. We lose ourselves succeeding(a) the wrong teachings and ideals, and only love has the power to make us whole, able to understand the divine plans and whole tone the way the universe moves. Hegel explains that it is so difficult for the man to bear this nullity, while our necessity i s always relative, the one exists only for the other (p.304).