Milk (Movie with Sean Penn) Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Milk ( with Sean Penn) - Movie Review ExampleTherefore, he was able to alter and strive for achievement of human right. However, his ambitions were short-lived by his wipeout in 1978 (Sandhu, 1). This paper will review the motion-picture show Milk and it outlines changes in attitudes that has occurred since late 1970s after assassination of Harvey Milk up to the present. Attitudes keep up changed significantly since 1970s and this is evident assessment of the transition from the combustible and cynical period in the history to the present (Sandhu, 1). For instance, it was not common for hoi polloi insure or talk about gays in fact, there were attacks of the equitable-right litigation. However, this transition was evoked by Milks activism, despite being hampered by his death in 1978 due to political rivalry this led to gradual change of attitude towards gays, which is seen today (Jones, 1). Moreover, Milks activism to promote equitable gay rights as has been considerably associat ed with the civil rights, which were supported by Martin Luther King. Therefore, as presented by the movie, there is a significant role played by Sean Penn, whereby he presents a character, mediocre rummy strips of battered manliness. Moreover, he presents a moderate, demonstrative masquerade of the extrovert businessmen operating from Wall Street (Travers, 1). The changes in attitude as introduced by this movie can be attested to by Milks reinvestments and political peoples imagination, who were not gays. Moreover, this acceptance of gays by other members of the public has go on from 1970s to the present. This movie presents Emile Hirsch, who becomes an activist, together with Diego Luna, who is Milks lover (Jones, 1). Moreover, this movie presents a good reason for change of attitudes towards gays, whereby Milk is both attractive, and has a stead attributes. On the other hand, there are proponents of same-sex marriages such as Californias Propositions eight. However, due to the changed attitude there are few politicians, who have been working hard to support legalization of same-sex marriages. The movie presents resentment towards gay people, which was portrayed by Dan White, who shot Harvey Milk and George Moscone in 1978 (Ebert, 1). In addition, their death was the forty-eight among the accessible reformer for gay rights in San Francisco. Dan worked with these victims in the citys board of supervisors, and he decided to shot them in the City Hall (Travers, 1). Nonetheless, cases of death among gay people due to the negative attitudes and heated from other members of the society have greatly reduced since 1978. It is evident that Milk offers pertinent ideas regarding transformation of lives among gay people since the death of Harvey Milk and his pursuit for achieving equitable rights (Travers, 1). Therefore, even after his death other that succeeded him was able to achieve prosperity, which was inform of freedom over state persecution, political and s ocial cause. In this case, the movie indicates some decisions made by people despite their emotional devastation. In addition, this memorable situation is presented at the end of the movie, where Harvey Milk is considered a hero (Ebert, 1). Milk is also depicted as an ordinary man, who has a range of attributes such as being idealistic, humorous, inconsistent, insightful, optimistic, and